[quagga-dev 1553] Re: [quagga-users 2787] Re: Multiple OSPF
paul at clubi.ie
Tue Sep 28 15:11:42 BST 2004
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Rick Payne wrote:
> Surely the zebra protocol needs a bit of an overhaul to make such a
> thing work correctly? As I recall, when you redistribute a
> protocol, it only allows you to specify the protocol type (ie.
> OSPF) rather then the protocol and instance (as you can do on other
It still works correctly, at least for redistribution. You just dont
have ability to specify which OSPF domain, you'd get both. Ie there
would be no fine-grained ability for other daemons to specify which
OSPF instance they want.
Whether there'd be other problems...
> I would resist going down the 'quick hack' route of running multiple
> instances of ospfd unaltered - it will only lead to misunderstandings.
Paul Jakma paul at clubi.ie paul at jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Program load too heavy for processor to lift.
More information about the Quagga-dev