[quagga-dev 4432] Re: [quagga-users 7613] Re: FW: Unicast routing with OSPF

Andrew J. Schorr aschorr at telemetry-investments.com
Wed Oct 11 21:39:02 BST 2006

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:33:49AM -0400, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
> By the way, this raises the whole question of what the ospf_interface
> 'address' field is supposed to represent.  Currently, it is set
> to the struct connected 'address' field, but that's arguably not
> very meaningful for a PtP /32 interface.  But the code seems to work
> at the moment, so I didn't muck with this.  I'm not sure what happens
> if you set it to CONNECTED_PREFIX instead, but that seems like
> a more useful value to me (in the abstract).

Actually, CONNECTED_ID seems like a slightly more sensible value to me
than CONNECTED_PREFIX, but as I said, this doesn't seem to matter
at this time...


More information about the Quagga-dev mailing list