[quagga-dev 4371] Re: bgpd printf size_t warning

Andrew J. Schorr aschorr at telemetry-investments.com
Wed Sep 20 14:28:43 BST 2006

On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 09:00:44AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> I think that's fine. len is smallish,  so surely the size_t values of
> interest fit in an unsigned long.

That begs the question: are you aware of any platforms where
a size_t has more bits than an unsigned long (since you seem to
be suggesting that this patch is not generally OK)?  I was assuming
that does not happen, but perhaps I'm mistaken...


More information about the Quagga-dev mailing list