[quagga-dev 7759] Re: Patchwork for quagga patches

Barry Friedman barryf at google.com
Wed Feb 3 08:17:04 GMT 2010


Hi Balaji,

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Balaji G <balajig81 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Barry
>
>> Just wondering, can anyone review these patches? I'm reasonably well
>> up to speed on bgpd an am willing to review patches if that will help.
>> There appear to be a good number of patches looking for some
>> attention. Also, any guidelines on what degree of testing is required
>> before a patch can be committed?
>
> I also work for the BGP and have some features.What we could probably
> do is divide among ourselves on the patches to be reviewed and get it
> done i believe. Infact there are more patches that's not there in the
> patch tracker. We are trying to sort out a method of tracking the
> patches and getting it forward. Probably you could also help out

Sure I'll be happy to help. How should we divide them up? Are there
some patches that have higher priority for review?

Thanks,
Barry

>
> Cheers,
>  - Balaji
>
> On 2/3/10, Barry Friedman <barryf at google.com> wrote:
>> There already seems to be a patchwork set up for Quagga:
>> http://patchwork.diac24.net/project/quagga/list/
>>
>> Ref email: http://marc.info/?l=quagga-dev&m=126453353407427&w=2
>>
>> Just wondering, can anyone review these patches? I'm reasonably well
>> up to speed on bgpd an am willing to review patches if that will help.
>> There appear to be a good number of patches looking for some
>> attention. Also, any guidelines on what degree of testing is required
>> before a patch can be committed?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Barry
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Bengt Gördén <bengan at bag.org> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've seen some patches being sent a second time. I don't want to be
>>> disrespectful towards developers and their donated time but it might be a
>>> good
>>> idea to implement patchwork for quagga. Stephen Hemminger suggested this a
>>> few
>>> month ago. I think the work flow for patches are better in patchwork than
>>> in
>>> bugzilla. I don't have the huge experience with patches as Stephen has but
>>> I've been following linux-netdev for some years now, although I haven't
>>> sent
>>> some patches there.
>>>
>>> ref.
>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/
>>> http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/ (project)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On monday 8th of June 2009 20:32:36 Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>>> Has anyone looked into patchwork
>>>>  http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/
>>>>
>>>> It works much better than bugzilla for tracking patches, since it
>>>>  integrates with existing mailing list. It is being used to handle 1000's
>>>>  of patches on the Linuxppc and netdev mailing list.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> /bengan



More information about the Quagga-dev mailing list