[quagga-dev 10933] Re: high-bandwidth, low-latency quagga necessary ?
ddutt at cumulusnetworks.com
Tue Dec 3 17:02:20 GMT 2013
Why do you want to do that within the context of quagga ?
On 12/03/2013 06:27 AM, Jose Gavine Cueto wrote:
> Hi David,
> Thank you for reminding me the obvious :) . Maybe I could develop
> some "fast path" plugin/api that can be used by quagga/c program for
> basically tx/rx'ng packets. I know that the processing in tx/rx is
> not of any concern of quagga, but I was wondering if there is such use
> case that the end-user wished for handling high-bandwidth control
> packets while using quagga.
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 8:37 PM, David Lamparter
> <equinox at opensourcerouting.org <mailto:equinox at opensourcerouting.org>>
> Hi Pepe,
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 06:47:30PM +0800, Jose Gavine Cueto wrote:
> > Is there a need for a high-bandwidth and low-latency
> optimization for
> > quagga ? I've used Intel's Data Plane Development Kit (DPDK), and
> Thank you for your offer, however, Quagga only implements the control
> plane and does not touch the data plane at all.
> To stop learning is like to stop loving.
> Quagga-dev mailing list
> Quagga-dev at lists.quagga.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Quagga-dev