[quagga-dev 10936] Re: high-bandwidth, low-latency quagga necessary ?
Jose Gavine Cueto
pepedocs at gmail.com
Wed Dec 4 02:17:38 GMT 2013
Just wondering if there's such a use case for quagga, so I could take
advantage of using DPDK. It could be used with minimal quagga code
modification. I'm thinking out of the box actually since I'm only a quagga
user and I don't know very much of its internals even if I've read some of
its code before.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Dinesh Dutt <ddutt at cumulusnetworks.com>wrote:
> Hi Pepe,
> Why do you want to do that within the context of quagga ?
> On 12/03/2013 06:27 AM, Jose Gavine Cueto wrote:
> Hi David,
> Thank you for reminding me the obvious :) . Maybe I could develop some
> "fast path" plugin/api that can be used by quagga/c program for basically
> tx/rx'ng packets. I know that the processing in tx/rx is not of any
> concern of quagga, but I was wondering if there is such use case that the
> end-user wished for handling high-bandwidth control packets while using
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 8:37 PM, David Lamparter <
> equinox at opensourcerouting.org> wrote:
>> Hi Pepe,
>> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 06:47:30PM +0800, Jose Gavine Cueto wrote:
>> > Is there a need for a high-bandwidth and low-latency optimization for
>> > quagga ? I've used Intel's Data Plane Development Kit (DPDK), and
>> Thank you for your offer, however, Quagga only implements the control
>> plane and does not touch the data plane at all.
> To stop learning is like to stop loving.
> Quagga-dev mailing listQuagga-dev at lists.quagga.nethttp://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
To stop learning is like to stop loving.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Quagga-dev