[quagga-dev 10842] Re: [PATCH 2/4] zebra: quagga-re-onlink-support.patch

Christian Franke nobody at nowhere.ws
Thu Oct 24 15:45:58 BST 2013

On 10/24/2013 12:44 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Dinesh G Dutt <ddutt at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote on 2013/10/24 06:06:43:
>> quagga-re-onlink-support.patch

> I recall this patch had some doubts in the past, I found my own comments 
> in quagga-dev 9519

Have you had a look at quagga-dev 10576? I feel that this general
approach might be a bit better as it doesn't yet introduce another
nexthop type, but there hasn't been all that much feedback on comparing
the two.

Quagga master supports NEXTHOP_IPV4_IFINDEX properly, so the only thing
that still has to be done on top of this patch would be adding a way
that allows routing daemons to set the NEXTHOP_FLAG_ONLINK via the IPC
protocol. (I only required that flag internally in zebra to address the
case of some recursive routes. Therefore, the patch didn't add a way to
set that flag via IPC, that shouldn't be too complicated though.)


More information about the Quagga-dev mailing list