[quagga-dev 11662] Re: [PATCH] bgpd: Fixes for recent well-known-attr check patch.
paul at jakma.org
Mon Oct 27 16:50:49 GMT 2014
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
> either way is fine for me, at least the benefit to remind thinking about
> "why" we have to do it. For instance, assuming someone sending an email
> to the mailing list (mistake can happen) instead of internal RnD, but he
> does not want his patch to be included...
> However, even for this last case, he/she can still ask to revert it.
Well, they'd have to followup and say "Oops, wasn't meant to be posted".
Otherwise it looks like a drive-by patch - which we'll still need to be
able to apply. ;)
> Somehow, honestly, I avoid re-inventing the wheel. It has become a
> well-known practice, so do I ;) Should we be more innovative, and
> revisit it for Quagga, I am fine when it is not used too.
Hey, you can still add it as you wish. :)
I just don't see the point of chasing people who don't, and having rounds
of emails and reposted patches.
Paul Jakma paul at jakma.org @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Their idea of an offer you can't refuse is an offer... and you'd better
More information about the Quagga-dev