[quagga-dev 11662] Re: [PATCH] bgpd: Fixes for recent well-known-attr check patch.

Paul Jakma paul at jakma.org
Mon Oct 27 16:50:49 GMT 2014


On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Vincent JARDIN wrote:

> either way is fine for me, at least the benefit to remind thinking about 
> "why" we have to do it. For instance, assuming someone sending an email 
> to the mailing list (mistake can happen) instead of internal RnD, but he 
> does not want his patch to be included...
>
> However, even for this last case, he/she can still ask to revert it.

Well, they'd have to followup and say "Oops, wasn't meant to be posted". 
Otherwise it looks like a drive-by patch - which we'll still need to be 
able to apply. ;)

> Somehow, honestly, I avoid re-inventing the wheel. It has become a 
> well-known practice, so do I ;) Should we be more innovative, and 
> revisit it for Quagga, I am fine when it is not used too.

Hey, you can still add it as you wish. :)

I just don't see the point of chasing people who don't, and having rounds 
of emails and reposted patches.

regards,
-- 
Paul Jakma	paul at jakma.org	@pjakma	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
Their idea of an offer you can't refuse is an offer... and you'd better
not refuse.




More information about the Quagga-dev mailing list