[quagga-dev 12186] Re: [PATCH 3/3] HACKING: COMMIT MESSAGE should give author/copyright details + required reading
paul at jakma.org
Mon Apr 27 17:18:32 BST 2015
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, David Lamparter wrote:
>> There is no consensus (neither on -dev nor on maintainers@) on the
>> procedural approach and licensing handling this patch tries to describe.
> Which bits do you object to exactly?
> Surely not all of it?
Oh, the aims of it were:
- Add a "REQUIRED READING" section up-front, to summarise the absolute
"musts" and other important information contributors need to know.
At the moment such info is inter-mingled with less important stuff and
rationale throughout the doc, so such a section seems a good idea.
- Make it clear contributors are responsible for documenting all legal
claims, and technical dependencies introduced, beyond the implicitly
obvious. This seems generally sensible.
- Make it clear what the licensing requirements are for contributors,
from what is (in my view) already implicit from the various copyright
notices in Quagga.
I suspect you only have an issue with one of those things (least, that I'm
Paul Jakma paul at jakma.org @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Don't tell any big lies today. Small ones can be just as effective.
More information about the Quagga-dev