[quagga-dev 14344] Re: Location of 'vrf <name>' option in a command
kei at nohguchi.com
Thu Dec 24 17:45:54 GMT 2015
>> So, I assume you are fine with changing zebra commands (such as this) to..
>> 'show ip route vrf <name> A.B.C.D/M'
>> from its previous form..
>> 'show ip route A.B.C.D/M vrf <name>'
> Which would be preferable here:
> Classic IOS
> show ip|ipv6 route [multicast] [vrf <name>] …
> or IOS-XR
> show route [vrf <name>] ipv4|ipv6 [unicast|multicast] ...
> with the positioning of "vrf <name>" perhaps subject to debate?
I feel the same, as it's subject to debate. But I feel IOS-XR style makes more sense, to be more symmetric.
Can we support both, to cover both camps, or is it just too much and better to pick one?
> I think that permitting the unicast keyword explicitly makes for a helpful symmetry, as does ipv4|ipv6 vs ip|ipv6.
More information about the Quagga-dev