[quagga-dev 12034] Re: [PATCH 1/6] build: remove --disable-ipv6
equinox at opensourcerouting.org
Tue Feb 10 14:44:05 GMT 2015
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 09:16:49AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
> David Lamparter <equinox at opensourcerouting.org> writes:
> > Building with IPv6 disabled tends to break rather often and sprinkles
> > ugly #ifdefs around the code. All that only to support systems where
> > the C library doesn't have IPv6 capability.
> > The year now being 2015, if this is a problem the thing to fix is the C
> > library.
> > The implication of this patch is that future patches need not care about
> > HAVE_IPV6 = 0 and may remove ifdefs gratuitously. This patch doesn't
> > remove these ifdefs to not create unneccessary churn.
> > Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox at opensourcerouting.org>
> That is an interesting proposal, but I think this one needs a bit more
I would've appreciated these comments 5 months ago when Paul posted his
"require IPv6 API built-time support" patches... that should really
have been ample time to voice concerns.
> I suppose this is different from choosing to build only the v4 protocol
> daemons. pkgsrc does have an inet6 option (on by default of course) to
> cause packages not to do v6.
> I will ask the netbsd folks; netbsd of course has had v6 for a really
> long time, more than 15 years, but some of them may have some useful
The matter at hand is simply that --disable-ipv6 in the build has
repeatedly been broken before without anyone noticing, and making it
work requires ugly #ifdef blocks. And all that is to support the case
of a *libc* without IPv6 support (symbols & structs). Runtime / Kernel
no-IPv6 is a different story.
If disabling inet6 on NetBSD builds a libc without IPv6 support, thus
causing Quagga to fail build with IPv6 enabled, I believe the best
solution would be to disallow building Quagga on NetBSD systems without
More information about the Quagga-dev