[quagga-dev 12081] Re: Advise on implementation

Greg Troxel gdt at ir.bbn.com
Tue Mar 3 15:19:15 GMT 2015

My basic opinion is that shm interfaces end up being painful for various
reasons, including portability but also leaving shm segments around.
Since this is control plane, and sockets are fast anyway, I don't see
any reason to get wrapped up in shm.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 180 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/attachments/20150303/4033a45d/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the Quagga-dev mailing list