[quagga-dev 12085] Re: Advise on implementation
olivier.dugeon at orange.com
Tue Mar 3 17:37:46 GMT 2015
What do you mean by 'may no longer be isolated from each other' ? They
are already link to the zebra daemon.
In order to implement BGP-LS, we need some communication between OSFP,
IS-IS and BGP. Of course, this will
break this isolation principle, but wathever the solution will be.
Le 03/03/2015 16:31, Dinesh Dutt a écrit :
> +1, plus the issue that the various daemons may no longer be isolated
> from each other due to this shm,
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Greg Troxel <gdt at ir.bbn.com
> <mailto:gdt at ir.bbn.com>> wrote:
> My basic opinion is that shm interfaces end up being painful for
> reasons, including portability but also leaving shm segments around.
> Since this is control plane, and sockets are fast anyway, I don't see
> any reason to get wrapped up in shm.
> Quagga-dev mailing list
> Quagga-dev at lists.quagga.net <mailto:Quagga-dev at lists.quagga.net>
More information about the Quagga-dev