[quagga-dev 12085] Re: Advise on implementation

Olivier Dugeon olivier.dugeon at orange.com
Tue Mar 3 17:37:46 GMT 2015


Hello Dinesh,

What do you mean by 'may no longer be isolated from each other' ? They 
are already link to the zebra daemon.
In order to implement BGP-LS, we need some communication between OSFP, 
IS-IS and BGP. Of course, this will
break this isolation principle, but wathever the solution will be.

Regards

Olivier

Le 03/03/2015 16:31, Dinesh Dutt a écrit :
> +1, plus the issue that the various daemons may no longer be isolated 
> from each other due to this shm,
>
> Dinesh
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Greg Troxel <gdt at ir.bbn.com 
> <mailto:gdt at ir.bbn.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     My basic opinion is that shm interfaces end up being painful for
>     various
>     reasons, including portability but also leaving shm segments around.
>     Since this is control plane, and sockets are fast anyway, I don't see
>     any reason to get wrapped up in shm.
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Quagga-dev mailing list
>     Quagga-dev at lists.quagga.net <mailto:Quagga-dev at lists.quagga.net>
>     https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
>
>






More information about the Quagga-dev mailing list