[quagga-dev 12086] Re: Advise on implementation

Greg Troxel gdt at ir.bbn.com
Tue Mar 3 17:39:00 GMT 2015

Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon at orange.com> writes:

>  - There is an architecture decision to take: do we continue to
> maintain / extend two communication channels i.e. ZAPI and OSPF_API or
> is it time to think to Quagga architecture and design a flexible
> channel (single or multiple) communication system for all purpose

Regardless of mechanism, one is an internal API among zebra/daemons, and
the other is an API from some daemon to users of that daemon.  External
APIs have greater stability needs.

That's not an answer, just a comment :-)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 180 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/attachments/20150303/84472a5a/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the Quagga-dev mailing list