[quagga-dev 15969] Re: bgpd regression of 8/ff results (was Re: Someone rebased volatile/patch-tracking/8/proposed/ff branch)
paul at jakma.org
Thu Jul 28 14:55:07 BST 2016
On Thu, 28 Jul 2016, Martin Winter wrote:
> I’ve tried to apply this as a patch earlier, but there seem to be more
> issues (which then get fixed later again).
> So not sure if we should abandon the attempt to have the branch
> passing any basic checks or even just compiling at each commit. In
> general, I would prefer if each commit passes at least compiling and
> potentially some basic checks,
> but that would potentially require to rebuild all the branch again
> after 4ab273b.
Will we just focus on getting ff to pass for now so? :)
Paul Jakma | paul at jakma.org | @pjakma | Key ID: 0xD86BF79464A2FF6A
More information about the Quagga-dev