[quagga-dev 15969] Re: bgpd regression of 8/ff results (was Re: Someone rebased volatile/patch-tracking/8/proposed/ff branch)

Paul Jakma paul at jakma.org
Thu Jul 28 14:55:07 BST 2016

On Thu, 28 Jul 2016, Martin Winter wrote:

> I’ve tried to apply this as a patch earlier, but there seem to be more 
> issues (which then get fixed later again).

> So not sure if we should abandon the attempt to have the branch 
> passing any basic checks or even just compiling at each commit. In 
> general, I would prefer if each commit passes at least compiling and 
> potentially some basic checks,

Yeah, ditto.

> but that would potentially require to rebuild all the branch again 
> after 4ab273b.

Will we just focus on getting ff to pass for now so? :)

Paul Jakma | paul at jakma.org | @pjakma | Key ID: 0xD86BF79464A2FF6A
Forty two.

More information about the Quagga-dev mailing list