[quagga-users 7110] Re: quagga and tun problems

Paul Jakma paul at clubi.ie
Sun Jun 18 01:53:11 IST 2006

On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:

> I know this is an old thread, but I was just bitten by it today.

> Can you see any reason why the attached (trivial) patch would not 
> fix the problem?  It simply creates the interface (by calling 
> if_get_by_name instead of if_lookup_by_name) if it doesn't already 
> exist...
> It seems to do the trick here.


> Is it clear whether this should be done in both the 
> "passive-interface" and "no passive-interface" subcommands?  I'm 
> not clear on whether we should instantiate the interface for a "no 
> passive-interface" command. It seems like this would be important 
> if we ever support default passive interfaces, but I'm not sure it 
> matters at the moment...

'reaping' interfaces that serve no purpose is ultimately probably 
better handled as a seperate problem, rather than on a per-command 

But right now, that could be left unchanged, yes.

Paul Jakma	paul at clubi.ie	paul at jakma.org	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
I don't want to live on in my work, I want to live on in my apartment.
 		-- Woody Allen

More information about the Quagga-users mailing list