[quagga-users 7110] Re: quagga and tun problems
paul at clubi.ie
Sun Jun 18 01:53:11 IST 2006
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
> I know this is an old thread, but I was just bitten by it today.
> Can you see any reason why the attached (trivial) patch would not
> fix the problem? It simply creates the interface (by calling
> if_get_by_name instead of if_lookup_by_name) if it doesn't already
> It seems to do the trick here.
> Is it clear whether this should be done in both the
> "passive-interface" and "no passive-interface" subcommands? I'm
> not clear on whether we should instantiate the interface for a "no
> passive-interface" command. It seems like this would be important
> if we ever support default passive interfaces, but I'm not sure it
> matters at the moment...
'reaping' interfaces that serve no purpose is ultimately probably
better handled as a seperate problem, rather than on a per-command
But right now, that could be left unchanged, yes.
Paul Jakma paul at clubi.ie paul at jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
I don't want to live on in my work, I want to live on in my apartment.
-- Woody Allen
More information about the Quagga-users