[quagga-users 7948] Re: [Fwd: 4 Byte AS tested]
eromijn at ripe.net
Wed Jan 17 12:08:06 GMT 2007
[ Why does it take 30 minutes for a message to get through the list? ]
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:17:28AM +0100, Juergen Kammer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 03:26:46PM +0000, Paul Jakma wrote:
> > [..]
> > Feedback on the testing would be useful.
> > [..]
> Indeed. And I'll wait for a bunch of feedback before realigning
> anything in the patch. If/when we know it works then there is time
> to shift things around should that be necessary.
I have been testing with a small setup and have found no issues so far.
I run a few ASN32 boxes of which one with a 32bit AS. There's one
non-ASN32 box. It seems NEW_AS_PATH and NEW_AGGREGATOR_AS work fine and
cause no issues for the older quagga. Tested this for both IPv4 and
I'll also test all this (again) for MRT dumps, but I think that
everything on the Quagga side is really fixed (until the specification
is changed, but the changes I proposed are trivial to change for Quagga).
Once all my other software for RIS is done I'll install a new Quagga
on one of our machines, where it will carry several full tables and
hopefully a couple of ASN32 routes.
Actually, I've already hooked up one asn32 capable quagga to "the real
thing" yesterday for a short time:
rrc99# sh ip bgp 126.96.36.199/24
BGP routing table entry for 188.8.131.52/24
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
12654 16215 3549 4637 1221 2.2
184.108.40.206 from 220.127.116.11 (18.104.22.168)
Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, best
Last update: Tue Jan 16 16:37:30 2007
So NEW_AS_PATH works nicely across many different asn16 routers.
Is anyone else also planning to test this? My use of quagga is most
likely not what most others would. I assume testing an asn32 capable
quagga with a 16bit AS would already be helpful, no need to get a new AS
> Quagga is not the place to fight for the input or output format
> of AS numbers. AS number representation is something which covers
> not only quagga configurations and bgp regexps, but configurations
> on all routers providing support for asn32 - and usage by the RIRs.
One interesting question: what are other network equipment vendors doing
now? (and which of them are working on asn32 at all)
> I personally would find it most confusing for the average
> multi-homing chap (who probably has no use of and no idea
> about bgp as-path regexps -- which are the one place things
> may, no, will become ugly) to get the AS number "3.3333" from his
> favourite RIR and then to realize that he has to use and will
> see 199943 all over the place, never seeing 3.3333 anywhere.
I forsee a whois client wrapper that translates 3.3333 to
large_number in that case ;-)
> This is why I think quagga should provide all formats,
> and the place to fight for one or the other format is on the appropriate
> mailing-lists and working groups.
Should supports for other formats be removed once a decision has been
Erik Romijn RIPE NCC jr. software engineer
http://www.ripe.net/ Information Services dept.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-users/attachments/20070117/b54be6a7/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the Quagga-users