[quagga-users 12522] Re: IPV4 and IPV6 configuration in BGP
Daniil M. Baturin
daniil at baturin.org
Wed Oct 19 08:12:12 IST 2011
They indeed may co-exist and it's a common practice. You may want to add
"no bgp default ipv4-unicast" to prevent your IPv6 neighbors from
advertising IPv4 unicast capability if you know or suppose your
IPv6-only peers may not like it.
On 10/19/2011 02:03 PM, vinnakota chaitanya wrote:
> Hi Friends,
> Can you clarify my doubt related to the BGP router configuration.
> My doubt is can both IPv4 and IPv6 configuration co-exist in a BGP
> router ?
> For example:-
> router bgp 7675
> bgp router-id 18.104.22.168
> neighbor 22.214.171.124.20 remote-as 7675
> neighbor 2001:468:555:200::6 remote-as 7675
> network 126.96.36.199/8
> address-family ipv6 unicast
> neighbor 2001:468:555:200::6 activate
> network 2001:468:4ff::/48
> Is the above configuration valid ?
> Do we need to have to run two BGP instances, one each for IPv4 and
> IPv6 configuration ?
> Quagga-users mailing list
> Quagga-users at lists.quagga.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Quagga-users